The future and Guide of clearing and settlement Firm
The clearing and settlement landscape could change rapidly in response to tokenisation. Today, securities such as equities and bonds are maintained in electronic book-entry accounts at centralised securities depositories. In the foreseeable future, they could “live” on distributed ledgers held across a network of traders where each has a synchronised copy.
Securities are tradable financial assets issued to raise funds from investors. Historically, securities were issued as paper certificates and the bearer was presumed to be the dog owner (bearer securities). However, moving newspaper certificates around is costly and risky.
Whenever the ownership of a security is transferred from one individual or institution to another, whether it be the sale of new shares via a short public offering (IPO) or existing shares sold on an exchange, there are three key processes that ever beforey transaction must endure:
Of the three processes, execution is easily the simplest of them all. Execution refers to a filled order, which happens when seller of a security finds a buyer willing to get it at a certain price, with the two parties getting into a legally binding transaction. Once the initial execution occurs the order will likely then go through clearing and finally to settlement. Put simply, negotiation is where in fact the actual exchange of money and securities between two parties in a trade is finalised, with trades usually settled within three days.
RQD Clearing is a next-generation correspondent clearing provider, providing advanced clearing, custody and execution solutions built for the modern markets. With the industry’s first solution built entirely on cloud-native, real-time technology, the firm can quickly and seamlessly enhance the platform, mitigate emerging cybersecurity threats and offer a more efficient implementation that scales as clients grow
Clearing is arguably the most complex of the three processes, with it dealing with the transference or money and securities. For investors and companies seeking to execute a trade, there are two different kinds of clearing available options: bilateral and central clearing.
Bilateral clearing is often utilised in over-the-counter (OTC) or off-exchange trading. In bilateral clearing, a contract is agreed directly by two parties minus the oversight of an exchange or any other intermediary. Instead, these contracts are traded via what is commonly categorised as a dealer network, not a centralised exchange, including the London Stock Exchange, but rather through direct negotiations often facilitated by broker-dealers like Fidelity Investments. One of the major features of OTC and bilateral clearing is the fact it includes individual investors or companies increased flexibility weighed against standardised exchange-bought and sold contracts, allowing parties to acknowledge an unusual contract size or other special requirement, with the deal’s price definitely not made public.
But despite the many features of OTC and bilateral clearing, with out a vacation in the form of a clearing house or exchange being present, there can be an increased default risk associated with OCT contracts for both parties. Furthermore, having less transparency in the OTC market means that regulators in many cases are left at night about the risk profile of contracts which can contribute to increased systemic risk.
Functions of a clearing house
The safer alternative to OTC and bilateral clearing is central clearing, which uses intermediaries, usually in the form of a clearing house or exchange, to clear trades. Stock exchanges, such as Nasdaq or London Stock Exchange (LSE) have their own clearing operations, which ensure that investors have enough capital in their respective accounts, whether that be by means of their own cash or broker-provided margin, to finance positions these are taking in the market at any given time, with this oversight function assisting to reduce counterparty risk.
The clearing units of the exchange operators not only decrease the risk of defaulting on a trade, however they also help facilitate a smoother transference of funds in one investor to another. Ultimately, when a trader wishes to exit his/her position in a given market they would like to rest in the knowledge that their money will be delivered to them in as fast and as timely a fashion as possible. An integral requirement to make certain that that happens is ensuring the buyer has enough funds to clear the trade. Put simply, the clearing house makes sure that both parties have all their ducks in a row so that trading can happen as smoothly as possible so that the trade is settled ASAP. To do that, clearing houses like LCH take both positions on each side of a trade, effectively becoming the counterparty to the both the buyer and the seller and, therefore, acting as a guarantor for the trade in the event of one of the two defaulting on the agreement. The clearing house will charge a fee for offering this service from traders to cover any potential losses that it may incur as the result of either a buyer or seller defaulting so that it can ensure that trade is resolved at the existing market price, assisting to preserve overall market stability.
Clearing houses provide several other important functions that increase the overall clearing and settlement process. One is hiding buyers and sellers’ identities from one another, helping investors keep a qualification of privacy about what actions they are taking in the market and the positions they hold and also have exited from. Clearing houses also aid to reduce the overall number of transactions being settled at any time across various markets, which really helps to reduce systemic pressure and allows financial markets to run more smoothly by limiting the worthiness of obligations being resolved – allowing capital to go more efficiently.